Reagan Trade Agreement

“Democrats had long defended workers` rights and Republicans had become a free trade party; this kind of break with Clinton,” Cowie says. Democrats were taken a step into the 1980, 1984, 1988 presidential elections, and they must figure out how to deal with the power of new conservatism in America. There was an old wing that wanted to fight for industrial protection measures and collective bargaining represented by the New Deal, and a new wing that moved to the right, and Clinton became the bearer of that movement, the New Democrat. The VICTORy of NAFTA is a great victory for the Conservatives in free trade. They were the ones who first defended free trade with Mexico. And they are the ones who will carry the banner of free trade in the future — a banner under which even Bill Clinton is now marching. The question, then, is whether President Trump`s strong opposition to free trade defines the current attitude of the Republican Party. There are at least three reasons to believe that. Although the heads of state and government of the three countries have signed the agreement, it will not enter into force until the governments of the three countries have adopted it. However, the United States has not yet passed the USMCA as law. House Democrats have insisted on additions from the USMCA that, among other things, strengthen labor laws and add environmental protection. During her election campaign, Hillary Clinton felt that the agreement was wrong. Both Clinton and Obama promised to change them. Nevertheless, NAFTA has somewhat met its targets, bringing US-Mexico trade to $481.5 billion in 2015 and U.S.-Canada trade totalling $518.2 billion.

This represents an increase of 255% and 63.5% respectively, according to the Mexican Embassy in Canada. While the jury goes beyond the question of whether these phenomenal increases are due exclusively to NAFTA (which they are almost certainly not), experts believe that the contract certainly helped. Yet protectionism is now being used by some American politicians as a form of cheap nationalism, as a vine leaf for those who are not ready to maintain American military force and who do not have the determination to oppose real enemies – countries that would use force against us or against our allies. Our peaceful trading partners are not our enemies; They`re our allies. We should be wary of demagogues who are willing to declare a trade war to our friends – to weaken our economy, our national security and the whole world – by cynically waving the American flag. The expansion of the international economy is not a foreign invasion; It is an American triumph on which we have worked hard, and something central to our vision of a peaceful and prosperous world of freedom. According to Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the Trump administration`s list “is very consistent with the president`s position on trade barriers that like protectionism.

Facebook Comments